ACME Fine Art’s exhibition titled Geometry & Abstraction
will be a visual essay on the use of geometry by twentieth century
American Modern artists to give form to their artistic ideas. The
exhibition will include painting and sculpture by more than a dozen
accomplished artists. The level of abstraction will range from
cubism, to neo-plasticism, to minimalism. In some cases the geometric
aspects of a piece may itself be an abstract notion, such as when
a cubist painting by Kenneth Stubbs utilizes the golden section
as its principal organizing concept. In other cases, in work by
Ilya Bolotowsky or James Rosati, the artist studies -even celebrates-
the juxtaposition of basic geometric forms in two or three-dimensional
space. Other featured artists will include: Charles Green Shaw,
Michael Loew, Raymond Jonson, Burgoyne Diller, Ray Parker, Myron
Stout, Giorgio Cavallon, Peter Busa, Ralph Coburn, Murray Hantman,
Panos Ghikas, Jim Gahagan, Haynes Ownby, and George Lloyd.
While the devices, means, and even the
geometric forms themselves may in some cases bear a certain resemblance
to each other, each
of the artist’s intents is to some extent unique. The following
excerpts from some of the artists’ statements about their
own work demonstrate the variety of intents expressed in the artists’ own
words:
Raymond Jonson - “It has been my hope to so purify, simplify,
and organize a work that it expresses completely my reaction, or
emotion, or sensation, in regard to nature, life…even to
the things that are not visible but have a profound emotional reaction
upon one.”
Michael Loew - “…geometric shapes are not necessarily
clear. When things are circumspect, or physically clear, it is
a purely optical phenomenon. It is a from of uncertainty.” “For
me the use of the rectangle or square…heightens the intensity
of the painting experience. In part because of the very hazards
involved: the form, while seemingly a curb or a dam, may liberate
the unforeseen.”
Ilya Bolotowsky - “In the early forties I still used diagonals.
A diagonal, of course, creates ambivalent depth- diagonal depth
might go either back or forth. It’s not like perspective
which goes only one way. …I had to give up diagonals because
the space going back and forth was becoming too violent. The diagonal
space was getting in the way of the tension on the flat surface.
You cannot get an absolute flatness in painting because of the
interplay of the colors, the way they feel to us. But you can achieve
relative flatness, within which the colors and the proportions
might push back and forth creating an extra tension. This tense
flatness must not destroy the overall flat tension, which, to my
mind, in two-dimensional painting is the most important thing.”
James Rosati - “Time gave me the courage to attempt more
daring things in a pure and much simpler way. When I started I
couldn’t have thought that organizing just the purest, simplest
forms having no relationship to anything but themselves, would
allow me to express an inner human feeling. I can do it now with
much more clarity. I don’t hesitate anymore about the concept.
It comes first, then I let the concept dictate whether it seems
to lend itself to stone, or to metal. I don’t concern myself
about a particular style or way of making sculpture. It took years.
All of the experiences have added up. Somehow, I think I’ve
come to a point now where I feel like I am a more complete sculptor.” “…I
worked not with the purpose that this critic likes this kind of
work, but for the purpose of what was going on right on the workbench…and
to make the best damn thing I could possibly make. It had no purpose
for existing other than the fact that it expressed at a particular
time something very definitely within me.”
Raymond Jonson - “I think some years
ago I created my own environment and I am still working in it.
You might call it an
inner environment if you like. My works are really contrasts to
the environment in which they exist. Around us we have realism,
strife, pain and greed. I wish to present the other side of life,
namely the feeling of order, joy and freedom.”
While at first glance one might consider
the creations of these artists to be primarily derived from a
purely cerebral process,
it is fascinating to consider how important it was to many of them
to convey sensation, emotion, and a sense of the artist’s
inner self. Certainly the concepts of synthesis and purity seem
to be essential common denominators as well. Despite the similarities
and divergences between the artists’ intent, and what can
be clearly seen in the resulting artwork, the use of basic geometric
elements to give form to their work is unanimous among the artists
and the work selected for this exhibition.
GEOMETRY & ABSTRACTION will be on
view at ACME Fine Art’s
38 Newbury
Street, Boston galleries from
17 November through 23 December 2006. An opening reception will
be held from 6-8 p.m.
on Friday 17 November.
Please
contact the gallery at 617.585.9551, or via e-mail at info@acmefineart.com for
further information.
|